<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Valuation Dispute Over Inter-Unit Transfers: Rule 8 vs. Former Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34943</link>
    <description>Valuation - goods manufactured by the assessee used by its another unit for captive consumption - Applicability of Rule 8 - upto 30.11.2013, appellants were required to discharge duty on the impugned clearances only as per erstwhile Rule 4 of the said Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000 - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 17:40:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 17:40:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Valuation Dispute Over Inter-Unit Transfers: Rule 8 vs. Former Rule 4 of Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34943</link>
      <description>Valuation - goods manufactured by the assessee used by its another unit for captive consumption - Applicability of Rule 8 - upto 30.11.2013, appellants were required to discharge duty on the impugned clearances only as per erstwhile Rule 4 of the said Central Excise Valuation Rules 2000 - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 17:40:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=34943</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>