https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192284 A fresh preventive detention order cannot validly rely, even in part, on the grounds of an earlier detention order that has been quashed by the High Court. Once quashed in writ jurisdiction, the earlier order stands nullified, and its grounds cannot form part of the material for the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. A subsequent detention may be made after expiry or revocation of an earlier order, but it must rest on independent fresh facts. Because the authority admitted that the previous grounds were considered and supplied to the detenu, the later detention was vitiated and could not be sustained. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2017 16:03:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192284 A fresh preventive detention order cannot validly rely, even in part, on the grounds of an earlier detention order that has been quashed by the High Court. Once quashed in writ jurisdiction, the earlier order stands nullified, and its grounds cannot form part of the material for the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction. A subsequent detention may be made after expiry or revocation of an earlier order, but it must rest on independent fresh facts. Because the authority admitted that the previous grounds were considered and supplied to the detenu, the later detention was vitiated and could not be sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192284