https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192276 Repeated threats, extortionary demands, intimidation of shopkeepers and firing in a public market were held to affect public order because their reach and potential impact created fear in the trading community and disturbed the even tempo of local life, so the law and order challenge failed. The alleged third incident was found genuine on the basis of prompt reporting and police verification, not concocted. No violation arose from the Advisory Board process because the detenu was informed of the option of a non-advocate friend but did not seek timely relief or show actual prejudice. The detention was sustained; delay in custody was explained by absconding and the reported had been considered by the Central Government. en-us Wed, 18 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2017 12:28:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192276 Repeated threats, extortionary demands, intimidation of shopkeepers and firing in a public market were held to affect public order because their reach and potential impact created fear in the trading community and disturbed the even tempo of local life, so the law and order challenge failed. The alleged third incident was found genuine on the basis of prompt reporting and police verification, not concocted. No violation arose from the Advisory Board process because the detenu was informed of the option of a non-advocate friend but did not seek timely relief or show actual prejudice. The detention was sustained; delay in custody was explained by absconding and the reported had been considered by the Central Government. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 18 Jan 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192276