https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192272 Preventive detention remains valid where the detenu's representation is processed promptly without unexplained delay, preserving the safeguard under Article 22(5). Continued prejudicial conduct, including a recent incident and absconding, may maintain the live link between past activities and the need for detention despite elapsed time before the order. Proper application of mind is established where the detaining authority considers relevant material, formulates grounds after review, and the record supports that process. The detention order was upheld because no avoidable delay, broken live link, or non-application of mind was established. en-us Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2017 11:06:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192272 Preventive detention remains valid where the detenu's representation is processed promptly without unexplained delay, preserving the safeguard under Article 22(5). Continued prejudicial conduct, including a recent incident and absconding, may maintain the live link between past activities and the need for detention despite elapsed time before the order. Proper application of mind is established where the detaining authority considers relevant material, formulates grounds after review, and the record supports that process. The detention order was upheld because no avoidable delay, broken live link, or non-application of mind was established. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192272