https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192270 Preventive detention under customs-linked allegations was examined on claims of non-application of mind, stale material, non-supply of bail papers, and delay in execution and representation. The record showed the detaining authority considered statements, seizure material, and test reports before satisfaction, so the challenge based on stale material failed. The interval before detention was explained by completion of investigation steps, and delay in service was attributed to the detenu's evasion, so neither invalidated the detention. Only documents relied upon for the grounds of detention had to be supplied under Article 22(5), so non-supply of the bail application and order did not breach the right of effective representation. en-us Mon, 14 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 19 Feb 2019 18:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192270 Preventive detention under customs-linked allegations was examined on claims of non-application of mind, stale material, non-supply of bail papers, and delay in execution and representation. The record showed the detaining authority considered statements, seizure material, and test reports before satisfaction, so the challenge based on stale material failed. The interval before detention was explained by completion of investigation steps, and delay in service was attributed to the detenu's evasion, so neither invalidated the detention. Only documents relied upon for the grounds of detention had to be supplied under Article 22(5), so non-supply of the bail application and order did not breach the right of effective representation. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 May 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192270