https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343339 The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order, citing financial difficulties. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD considered the appellant's submissions, including references to rulings by the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court. Emphasizing the importance of deciding matters on their merits, the Tribunal restored the appeal and directed the appellant to make a reduced deposit within a specified timeframe. The appellant was required to deposit &8377; 5 lakhs within 08 weeks. The judgment underscored the need to avoid dismissing appeals for procedural non-compliance and to focus on deciding cases based on their merits. en-us Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2017 07:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343339 The appeal was dismissed due to non-compliance with a pre-deposit order, citing financial difficulties. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD considered the appellant's submissions, including references to rulings by the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court. Emphasizing the importance of deciding matters on their merits, the Tribunal restored the appeal and directed the appellant to make a reduced deposit within a specified timeframe. The appellant was required to deposit &8377; 5 lakhs within 08 weeks. The judgment underscored the need to avoid dismissing appeals for procedural non-compliance and to focus on deciding cases based on their merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343339