<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1073 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343335</link>
    <description>The tribunal granted condonation for a 7-day appeal filing delay, consolidated two appeals on cement clearances for common disposal, and upheld the imposition of penalties under Section 11 AC and Rule 27 due to deliberate suppression of material facts by the appellants. It clarified the applicability of Rule 8 post-amendment, ruling in favor of Rule 4 valuation up to 30.11.2013 and dismissing the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2018 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1073 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343335</link>
      <description>The tribunal granted condonation for a 7-day appeal filing delay, consolidated two appeals on cement clearances for common disposal, and upheld the imposition of penalties under Section 11 AC and Rule 27 due to deliberate suppression of material facts by the appellants. It clarified the applicability of Rule 8 post-amendment, ruling in favor of Rule 4 valuation up to 30.11.2013 and dismissing the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>