<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1072 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343334</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original for confiscation of goods, duty demand, and penalties imposed on a 100% EOU engaged in manufacturing Agro Chemicals. The appellants had imported goods of Indian origin instead of Chinese as declared, leading to the seizure and subsequent proceedings. Despite the mistake by the overseas supplier, re-export of the goods was allowed, and the Tribunal found no merit in the penalties imposed, granting relief to the appellants based on precedents where re-export due to supplier error warranted no confiscation or penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 07:54:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469494" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1072 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343334</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Original for confiscation of goods, duty demand, and penalties imposed on a 100% EOU engaged in manufacturing Agro Chemicals. The appellants had imported goods of Indian origin instead of Chinese as declared, leading to the seizure and subsequent proceedings. Despite the mistake by the overseas supplier, re-export of the goods was allowed, and the Tribunal found no merit in the penalties imposed, granting relief to the appellants based on precedents where re-export due to supplier error warranted no confiscation or penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>