<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1071 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343333</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalties imposed on the appellants unsustainable due to insufficient evidence and reliance on uncorroborated statements of a co-accused. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence in cases involving penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment was pronounced on 04/05/2017 by the Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1071 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343333</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalties imposed on the appellants unsustainable due to insufficient evidence and reliance on uncorroborated statements of a co-accused. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the appeal and emphasizing the necessity of corroborative evidence in cases involving penalties under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The judgment was pronounced on 04/05/2017 by the Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Hyderabad.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>