https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343326 The Court declined to add a petition challenging the validity of Section 9(2)(g) of the DVAT Act to an existing batch under consideration. It found the VATO's denial of refund and issuance of excessive default assessment notices to be an abuse of process. The Court quashed the default assessment notices, directing the refund amount and interest to be promptly credited to the Petitioner. The judgment ensures compliance and outlines further remedies available to the Petitioner in case of non-compliance by the Respondent DVAT Department. en-us Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2017 07:53:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343326 The Court declined to add a petition challenging the validity of Section 9(2)(g) of the DVAT Act to an existing batch under consideration. It found the VATO's denial of refund and issuance of excessive default assessment notices to be an abuse of process. The Court quashed the default assessment notices, directing the refund amount and interest to be promptly credited to the Petitioner. The judgment ensures compliance and outlines further remedies available to the Petitioner in case of non-compliance by the Respondent DVAT Department. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343326