<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1060 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343322</link>
    <description>The monthly tax period under the Act could not be converted into a single yearly assessment by clubbing twelve months together, so the assessment order was unsustainable and was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with directions that the assessee appear before the department with books of account and other documents. The department may examine the records, issue notice if any anomaly is found, and then complete assessment in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 07:53:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1060 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343322</link>
      <description>The monthly tax period under the Act could not be converted into a single yearly assessment by clubbing twelve months together, so the assessment order was unsustainable and was set aside. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration, with directions that the assessee appear before the department with books of account and other documents. The department may examine the records, issue notice if any anomaly is found, and then complete assessment in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>