<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1059 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343321</link>
    <description>The revisional application challenging the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s order was successful. The impugned order was set aside due to patent perversity, leading to a manifest failure of justice. The Tribunal was directed to promptly decide on the pending application within four weeks. The revisional application was disposed of with no order as to costs, and certified copies of the order were to be provided to the parties upon request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 07:53:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1059 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343321</link>
      <description>The revisional application challenging the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s order was successful. The impugned order was set aside due to patent perversity, leading to a manifest failure of justice. The Tribunal was directed to promptly decide on the pending application within four weeks. The revisional application was disposed of with no order as to costs, and certified copies of the order were to be provided to the parties upon request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>