https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343317 The court set aside the ITSC's order declining the petitioners' applications and directed the ITSC to entertain and proceed with the applications of the four petitioners on the same basis as the six other companies in the Bindal Group. The court found the differential treatment by the ITSC unjustified and lacking a rational basis, emphasizing the need for consistent application of criteria. The writ petitions were allowed, and the applications were disposed of with no orders as to costs. en-us Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 23 May 2017 07:52:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343317 The court set aside the ITSC's order declining the petitioners' applications and directed the ITSC to entertain and proceed with the applications of the four petitioners on the same basis as the six other companies in the Bindal Group. The court found the differential treatment by the ITSC unjustified and lacking a rational basis, emphasizing the need for consistent application of criteria. The writ petitions were allowed, and the applications were disposed of with no orders as to costs. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343317