<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1045 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343307</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings due to the lack of nexus between interest paid and investments made, improper application of Rule 8D, unjustified disallowance of expenses attributable to exempt income, lack of justification for interest-free advances, and failure to establish expenditure for earning exempt income as required under Section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 07:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1045 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343307</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s findings due to the lack of nexus between interest paid and investments made, improper application of Rule 8D, unjustified disallowance of expenses attributable to exempt income, lack of justification for interest-free advances, and failure to establish expenditure for earning exempt income as required under Section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343307</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>