<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1023 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343285</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original confirming demands for service tax liability, penalties, and interest against the appellant Sangh engaged in harvesting and transporting sugarcane. The Tribunal held that the activities did not fall under Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services, citing precedents from the High Court of Bombay that ruled similarly in previous cases involving comparable activities. The Tribunal found the tax liability order unsustainable based on established legal precedents and provided for consequential relief in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:28:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1023 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343285</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Original confirming demands for service tax liability, penalties, and interest against the appellant Sangh engaged in harvesting and transporting sugarcane. The Tribunal held that the activities did not fall under Manpower Recruitment and Supply Agency Services, citing precedents from the High Court of Bombay that ruled similarly in previous cases involving comparable activities. The Tribunal found the tax liability order unsustainable based on established legal precedents and provided for consequential relief in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>