<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1019 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343281</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the value of free raw material should have been included in the assessable value, and the appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification as they did not produce or manufacture the goods. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:27:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1019 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343281</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision that the value of free raw material should have been included in the assessable value, and the appellant was not entitled to the benefit of the exemption notification as they did not produce or manufacture the goods. The appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>