<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1014 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343276</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that there was no legal basis for the related party allegation between the appellant, Duchem Laboratories Ltd., and Pfizer Ltd. The Revenue failed to prove the interconnected relationship between the companies, establishing that they were not related parties under the Central Excise Act. The terms of the agreement indicated a service provider-client relationship, and there was no evidence of mutual business interest. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of clear evidence in related party allegations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:27:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1014 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343276</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that there was no legal basis for the related party allegation between the appellant, Duchem Laboratories Ltd., and Pfizer Ltd. The Revenue failed to prove the interconnected relationship between the companies, establishing that they were not related parties under the Central Excise Act. The terms of the agreement indicated a service provider-client relationship, and there was no evidence of mutual business interest. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, emphasizing the importance of clear evidence in related party allegations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>