<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1008 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343270</link>
    <description>The court revalidated the Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) for 12 months and directed the Regional Authority to endorse it. The court allowed the import of insecticides specified in the Norms Committee Decision, subject to quantity restrictions in the DFIA. Emphasizing the need to prevent retrospective amendments and unnecessary litigation, the court requested the Attorney General of India to advise respondents accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2017 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1008 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343270</link>
      <description>The court revalidated the Duty Free Import Authorization (DFIA) for 12 months and directed the Regional Authority to endorse it. The court allowed the import of insecticides specified in the Norms Committee Decision, subject to quantity restrictions in the DFIA. Emphasizing the need to prevent retrospective amendments and unnecessary litigation, the court requested the Attorney General of India to advise respondents accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>