https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343266 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to one party's lack of interest, stemming from their prior admission and actions regarding illegal imports. Penalties imposed on a Customs House Agent (CHA) and a G card holder for violations related to import procedures were set aside. The judgment criticized the lack of evidence showing the parties' knowledge of contravened goods and deemed delays in filing documents insufficient grounds for penalties. Legal precedents were cited to support the decision, ultimately allowing both appeals with relief to the appellants. en-us Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 09 Feb 2018 16:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343266 The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution due to one party's lack of interest, stemming from their prior admission and actions regarding illegal imports. Penalties imposed on a Customs House Agent (CHA) and a G card holder for violations related to import procedures were set aside. The judgment criticized the lack of evidence showing the parties' knowledge of contravened goods and deemed delays in filing documents insufficient grounds for penalties. Legal precedents were cited to support the decision, ultimately allowing both appeals with relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 16 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343266