https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343257 The High Court allowed the application in C.A. 243 of 2014, recalling the order dated August 12, 2013, in C.P. 537 of 2013 and restoring Company Petition No. 537 of 2013 to its original file and number. The Court held that it had jurisdiction to entertain an application for recalling an order under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, rejecting the argument that such matters should be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal. It found that the original application for restoration was based on false information, leading to the order being obtained through suppression of material facts and fraud. en-us Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Jan 2018 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343257 The High Court allowed the application in C.A. 243 of 2014, recalling the order dated August 12, 2013, in C.P. 537 of 2013 and restoring Company Petition No. 537 of 2013 to its original file and number. The Court held that it had jurisdiction to entertain an application for recalling an order under Section 560(6) of the Companies Act, rejecting the argument that such matters should be transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal. It found that the original application for restoration was based on false information, leading to the order being obtained through suppression of material facts and fraud. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343257