<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 994 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343256</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petitions challenging the order reducing compounding fees, affirming that the fee imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge was fair and just. The Court emphasized the importance of applying the principle of proportionality in sentencing and administrative decisions to maintain fairness and reasonableness in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:25:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 994 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343256</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petitions challenging the order reducing compounding fees, affirming that the fee imposed by the Additional Sessions Judge was fair and just. The Court emphasized the importance of applying the principle of proportionality in sentencing and administrative decisions to maintain fairness and reasonableness in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>