<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 989 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343251</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order on unaccounted investments, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s estimate based on historical production data. Despite ITAT granting additional relief by reducing production cycle days, no further relief was granted upon review. The Court emphasized the importance of reasoned decision-making in tax assessments and found no substantial question of law in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 989 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343251</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal challenging the ITAT&#039;s order on unaccounted investments, upholding the CIT (A)&#039;s estimate based on historical production data. Despite ITAT granting additional relief by reducing production cycle days, no further relief was granted upon review. The Court emphasized the importance of reasoned decision-making in tax assessments and found no substantial question of law in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>