<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 985 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343247</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision against the appellant, emphasizing that the activities conducted were commercial in nature and did not align with charitable objectives, thus making them ineligible for benefits under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court referenced a previous judgment and found that similar questions had been answered against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:24:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469346" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 985 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343247</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision against the appellant, emphasizing that the activities conducted were commercial in nature and did not align with charitable objectives, thus making them ineligible for benefits under Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court referenced a previous judgment and found that similar questions had been answered against the Revenue, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>