<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 978 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343240</link>
    <description>The appellate court canceled the revisional order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) dated 25.02.2015, as the Assessing Officer (AO) had adequately examined the issues raised by the CIT. The court found that the AO&#039;s actions were justified, and the conditions necessary for the CIT to exercise jurisdiction under Section 263 were not met. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT&#039;s order was overturned in a judgment pronounced on 19.05.2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:24:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 978 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343240</link>
      <description>The appellate court canceled the revisional order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) dated 25.02.2015, as the Assessing Officer (AO) had adequately examined the issues raised by the CIT. The court found that the AO&#039;s actions were justified, and the conditions necessary for the CIT to exercise jurisdiction under Section 263 were not met. Therefore, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the CIT&#039;s order was overturned in a judgment pronounced on 19.05.2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>