<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 969 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(C) for Rs. 3,11,37,351 due to lack of clarity in charges and violation of natural justice principles. The decision was based on distinguishing between inaccurate particulars of income and concealing income, supported by legal analysis and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 08:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469330" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 969 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the penalty proceedings under section 271(1)(C) for Rs. 3,11,37,351 due to lack of clarity in charges and violation of natural justice principles. The decision was based on distinguishing between inaccurate particulars of income and concealing income, supported by legal analysis and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>