<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343227</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that interest on delayed payment of receivables from associated enterprises constitutes a separate international transaction requiring independent arm&#039;s length price determination, distinct from working capital adjustments. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that such interest gets subsumed in working capital adjustments, following precedents in Ameriprise India and McKinsey Knowledge Centre cases. The court clarified that working capital adjustments apply only to service rendering transactions and cannot impact the separate benchmarking requirement for interest on overdue receivables. The tribunal also dismissed the argument that being debt-free exempts the company from interest attribution on delayed realizations, emphasizing that this represents a distinct international transaction. The ITAT upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s direction to compute adjustments using six-month LIBOR plus 400 basis points for USD receivables, consistent with Cotton Naturals HC precedent regarding current year interest rate determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469326" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 965 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343227</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that interest on delayed payment of receivables from associated enterprises constitutes a separate international transaction requiring independent arm&#039;s length price determination, distinct from working capital adjustments. The tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s contention that such interest gets subsumed in working capital adjustments, following precedents in Ameriprise India and McKinsey Knowledge Centre cases. The court clarified that working capital adjustments apply only to service rendering transactions and cannot impact the separate benchmarking requirement for interest on overdue receivables. The tribunal also dismissed the argument that being debt-free exempts the company from interest attribution on delayed realizations, emphasizing that this represents a distinct international transaction. The ITAT upheld the Dispute Resolution Panel&#039;s direction to compute adjustments using six-month LIBOR plus 400 basis points for USD receivables, consistent with Cotton Naturals HC precedent regarding current year interest rate determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>