<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1211 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192244</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of interest under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance but limited it to the amount of dividend income received, aligning with a previous ITAT order. Despite arguments on surplus funds and minimal borrowings, the disallowance was restricted to Rs. 60,016. The decision was based on the mixed use of funds for investments, supporting the application of section 14A.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 07:21:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1211 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192244</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the disallowance of interest under section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance but limited it to the amount of dividend income received, aligning with a previous ITAT order. Despite arguments on surplus funds and minimal borrowings, the disallowance was restricted to Rs. 60,016. The decision was based on the mixed use of funds for investments, supporting the application of section 14A.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192244</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>