<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (2) TMI 1207 - Allahabad high court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192248</link>
    <description>Reassessment for the 2010-11 assessment year could not be initiated on a mere change of opinion where the same job-work transaction involving varnish had already been examined in the original assessment and treated as an inter-State sale taxable at 2% on the basis of Form C. The sanction for reopening disclosed no fresh material or new information, and it relied only on a different view taken in a later assessment year. On those facts, the reopening lacked the statutory foundation required to confer jurisdiction, so the reassessment proceedings were invalid and the sanction order and notice were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2018 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (2) TMI 1207 - Allahabad high court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192248</link>
      <description>Reassessment for the 2010-11 assessment year could not be initiated on a mere change of opinion where the same job-work transaction involving varnish had already been examined in the original assessment and treated as an inter-State sale taxable at 2% on the basis of Form C. The sanction for reopening disclosed no fresh material or new information, and it relied only on a different view taken in a later assessment year. On those facts, the reopening lacked the statutory foundation required to confer jurisdiction, so the reassessment proceedings were invalid and the sanction order and notice were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>