<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 960 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability on the commission received by the financial broker for providing loan arrangement services, deeming the activities as falling under Business Auxiliary Services as per the statutory definition. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the original order confirming the tax liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2017 14:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 960 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the service tax liability on the commission received by the financial broker for providing loan arrangement services, deeming the activities as falling under Business Auxiliary Services as per the statutory definition. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the original order confirming the tax liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>