<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 950 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeals filed by the appellant-assessee and the Director. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistent statements and evidence in proving allegations of clandestine activities and fraudulent practices in excise matters. The decision underscored the significance of thorough investigations and adherence to statutory records to prevent duty evasion and fraudulent credit practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2017 09:06:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 950 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order, rejecting the appeals filed by the appellant-assessee and the Director. The judgment emphasized the importance of consistent statements and evidence in proving allegations of clandestine activities and fraudulent practices in excise matters. The decision underscored the significance of thorough investigations and adherence to statutory records to prevent duty evasion and fraudulent credit practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>