https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343207 The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding a refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which was rejected due to goods being exported in a different month than the claimed quarter. The Tribunal held that as long as the goods were exported within the prescribed time frame, denial of the refund based solely on the month of physical export was unwarranted. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief deemed appropriate. en-us Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 May 2017 09:06:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343207 The Tribunal allowed the appeal regarding a refund claim under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, which was rejected due to goods being exported in a different month than the claimed quarter. The Tribunal held that as long as the goods were exported within the prescribed time frame, denial of the refund based solely on the month of physical export was unwarranted. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief deemed appropriate. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 19 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343207