https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343202 The appeals were directed against an order confirming demand, interest, and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods. The first appellate authority set aside the order confirming demand, interest, and penalties, citing multiple proceedings for the same violation and inapplicability of penalties under Rule 26 to a corporate body. The Revenue's appeals were found lacking in merit, and the impugned order was upheld, rejecting the Revenue's appeals. The decision was made in the absence of representation from the respondent, with the grounds of appeal by the Revenue deemed devoid of merits. en-us Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 May 2017 09:06:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343202 The appeals were directed against an order confirming demand, interest, and penalties for alleged clandestine removal of goods. The first appellate authority set aside the order confirming demand, interest, and penalties, citing multiple proceedings for the same violation and inapplicability of penalties under Rule 26 to a corporate body. The Revenue's appeals were found lacking in merit, and the impugned order was upheld, rejecting the Revenue's appeals. The decision was made in the absence of representation from the respondent, with the grounds of appeal by the Revenue deemed devoid of merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343202