<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 929 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343191</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of rough diamonds for export, valued at Rs. 58.57 lakhs, due to discrepancies in valuation and non-compliance with its directions. It criticized the arbitrary exercise of power by the Commissioner of Customs, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness and legal justifiability in customs valuation disputes. The judgment highlighted the importance of expert evaluation and compliance with statutory provisions, ultimately ruling the confiscation unjustified as there was no ban on diamond exports and no revenue involved in the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469235" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 929 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343191</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of rough diamonds for export, valued at Rs. 58.57 lakhs, due to discrepancies in valuation and non-compliance with its directions. It criticized the arbitrary exercise of power by the Commissioner of Customs, emphasizing adherence to procedural fairness and legal justifiability in customs valuation disputes. The judgment highlighted the importance of expert evaluation and compliance with statutory provisions, ultimately ruling the confiscation unjustified as there was no ban on diamond exports and no revenue involved in the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343191</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>