<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 921 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the taxation of certain incomes under Section 80IB and the excise duty refund treatment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the set-off of indirect income, treating the excise duty refund as a capital receipt, and deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The delay in filing cross objections was condoned, and the cross objections partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 May 2017 13:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 921 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals challenging the taxation of certain incomes under Section 80IB and the excise duty refund treatment. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions on the set-off of indirect income, treating the excise duty refund as a capital receipt, and deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c). The delay in filing cross objections was condoned, and the cross objections partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>