https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192213 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging show cause notices for cess recovery was dismissed as premature because the petitioner had not first filed replies to the notices. The Court declined to examine the merits of the proposed recovery at that stage and held that the proper course was to respond to the notices in the first instance. Liberty was granted to file replies and thereafter pursue appropriate remedies, if so advised. en-us Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 May 2017 08:59:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192213 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging show cause notices for cess recovery was dismissed as premature because the petitioner had not first filed replies to the notices. The Court declined to examine the merits of the proposed recovery at that stage and held that the proper course was to respond to the notices in the first instance. Liberty was granted to file replies and thereafter pursue appropriate remedies, if so advised. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 09 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192213