https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192217 The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal, directing the refund of excise duty paid by the petitioner. The Court emphasized the duty of the assessing authority to refund amounts covered by appellate orders promptly and without unjust enrichment considerations. The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the show cause notice and directing the respondent to refund the entire amount with interest within one month, with the petitioner only required to provide an indemnity bond if necessary. en-us Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192217 The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal, directing the refund of excise duty paid by the petitioner. The Court emphasized the duty of the assessing authority to refund amounts covered by appellate orders promptly and without unjust enrichment considerations. The writ petition was allowed, setting aside the show cause notice and directing the respondent to refund the entire amount with interest within one month, with the petitioner only required to provide an indemnity bond if necessary. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192217