https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192223 The judgment corrected a typographical error in the order by rectifying the listing date of the appeal and acknowledging the presence of counsel for both respondents. It highlighted delays in delivering the judgment due to office changes and directed the appellate tribunal to promptly dispose of the appeal within three months from the final arguments. The order emphasized expeditious resolution of the appeal and mandated a dasti copy of the order for compliance and reference. en-us Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 May 2017 08:59:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192223 The judgment corrected a typographical error in the order by rectifying the listing date of the appeal and acknowledging the presence of counsel for both respondents. It highlighted delays in delivering the judgment due to office changes and directed the appellate tribunal to promptly dispose of the appeal within three months from the final arguments. The order emphasized expeditious resolution of the appeal and mandated a dasti copy of the order for compliance and reference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192223