https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192224 The court upheld the order of the Additional Commissioner, Income Tax, Range-3, directing a company to pay the entire demand in installments in line with Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act. The court dismissed the petitioner's reliance on CBDT circulars for waiver of predeposit, emphasizing timely payment. Comparing the case with a previous judgment, the court found no justification to deviate from the decision. The court directed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to expedite the hearing of the stay application. Ultimately, the court affirmed the validity of the impugned order and clarified the application of Section 220(6) and tax authorities' discretion. en-us Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Sep 2018 17:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192224 The court upheld the order of the Additional Commissioner, Income Tax, Range-3, directing a company to pay the entire demand in installments in line with Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act. The court dismissed the petitioner's reliance on CBDT circulars for waiver of predeposit, emphasizing timely payment. Comparing the case with a previous judgment, the court found no justification to deviate from the decision. The court directed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to expedite the hearing of the stay application. Ultimately, the court affirmed the validity of the impugned order and clarified the application of Section 220(6) and tax authorities' discretion. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192224