<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1966 (12) TMI 8 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7867</link>
    <description>Marriage expenses of an unmarried daughter are a legitimate charge on the joint family estate, and the father also has an independent parental obligation to meet them; the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 recognises that obligation without creating inconsistency with Hindu law. For expenditure-tax purposes, amounts paid from gifts received by the parents in their individual capacity were not attributable to the Hindu undivided family because no actual use of family funds was proved. The marriage expenditure was therefore not treated as expenditure incurred by the family under section 4(i), and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee on the proved facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46917" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1966 (12) TMI 8 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7867</link>
      <description>Marriage expenses of an unmarried daughter are a legitimate charge on the joint family estate, and the father also has an independent parental obligation to meet them; the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956 recognises that obligation without creating inconsistency with Hindu law. For expenditure-tax purposes, amounts paid from gifts received by the parents in their individual capacity were not attributable to the Hindu undivided family because no actual use of family funds was proved. The marriage expenditure was therefore not treated as expenditure incurred by the family under section 4(i), and the reference was answered in favour of the assessee on the proved facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 1966 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>