https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343153 The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellant, a property rental service provider, in a service tax dispute for the period April 2010 to March 2011. The court reduced the confirmed amount owed, considering evidence that the recipient, Central Bank of India, was paying service tax. The penalty under Section 78 was waived due to the appellant's genuine belief that the tax liability rested with the bank. The case was remanded for re-quantification of the demand based on the bank's payments, and the judgment modified accordingly. en-us Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2017 18:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343153 The appellate court ruled in favor of the appellant, a property rental service provider, in a service tax dispute for the period April 2010 to March 2011. The court reduced the confirmed amount owed, considering evidence that the recipient, Central Bank of India, was paying service tax. The penalty under Section 78 was waived due to the appellant's genuine belief that the tax liability rested with the bank. The case was remanded for re-quantification of the demand based on the bank's payments, and the judgment modified accordingly. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343153