https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343151 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant's eligibility to avail CENVAT credit for service tax paid under the reverse charge mechanism for 'Intellectual Property Rights Service' and 'Information Technology Software Service'. The Tribunal found the Revenue's argument regarding distribution of service tax credit across various units unsustainable, noting that the appellant had discharged the service tax liability and was entitled to the credit. The impugned order was set aside, affirming the appellant's right to avail the CENVAT credit. en-us Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 Nov 2017 16:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343151 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the appellant's eligibility to avail CENVAT credit for service tax paid under the reverse charge mechanism for 'Intellectual Property Rights Service' and 'Information Technology Software Service'. The Tribunal found the Revenue's argument regarding distribution of service tax credit across various units unsustainable, noting that the appellant had discharged the service tax liability and was entitled to the credit. The impugned order was set aside, affirming the appellant's right to avail the CENVAT credit. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 29 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343151