<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 881 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343143</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties on partners of a manufacturing firm under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, separate from penalties on the firm. Penalties on partners were reduced to Rs. 50,000 each, aligning with the manufacturing unit&#039;s reduced penalty liability due to actions during investigation. The tribunal clarified that penalties on partners could be imposed independently, considering distinct offenses and provisions. The appeal was mostly rejected, except for the modification reducing partners&#039; penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2017 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 881 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343143</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the imposition of penalties on partners of a manufacturing firm under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002, separate from penalties on the firm. Penalties on partners were reduced to Rs. 50,000 each, aligning with the manufacturing unit&#039;s reduced penalty liability due to actions during investigation. The tribunal clarified that penalties on partners could be imposed independently, considering distinct offenses and provisions. The appeal was mostly rejected, except for the modification reducing partners&#039; penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>