<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 870 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343132</link>
    <description>The appellant challenged the denial of CENVAT credit on structural items. The lower authorities rejected the credit, but the appellant relied on precedent and related cases where such credit was allowed. The judge considered previous judgments favoring the appellant, ultimately ruling in their favor and setting aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 07:50:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469106" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 870 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343132</link>
      <description>The appellant challenged the denial of CENVAT credit on structural items. The lower authorities rejected the credit, but the appellant relied on precedent and related cases where such credit was allowed. The judge considered previous judgments favoring the appellant, ultimately ruling in their favor and setting aside the impugned order, allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>