https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343127 The court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking mandamus for the release of goods covered under a Bill of Entry. The court held that the petitioner should exhaust the remedy available before the CESTAT, where an appeal challenging the authorities' decisions had been filed but not yet numbered. The judge emphasized that the petitioner must pursue relief through the CESTAT before approaching the High Court. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was granted liberty to seek interim relief before the CESTAT without costs imposed. en-us Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 May 2017 07:50:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343127 The court dismissed the writ petition filed by the petitioner seeking mandamus for the release of goods covered under a Bill of Entry. The court held that the petitioner should exhaust the remedy available before the CESTAT, where an appeal challenging the authorities' decisions had been filed but not yet numbered. The judge emphasized that the petitioner must pursue relief through the CESTAT before approaching the High Court. The writ petition was not entertained, and the petitioner was granted liberty to seek interim relief before the CESTAT without costs imposed. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343127