<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 863 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343125</link>
    <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) overturned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to confiscate seized Betel Nuts and vehicles, deeming the confiscation illegal due to lack of evidence of illegal importation. The Adjudicator relied on circumstantial evidence, but the Commissioner emphasized the department&#039;s failure to prove the goods were smuggled. The Commissioner&#039;s decision, supported by Tribunal cases, stressed the burden of proof on the department. The judgment upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and emphasizing the importance of proper evidence in customs-related cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 14:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469099" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 863 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343125</link>
      <description>The Commissioner (Appeals) overturned the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to confiscate seized Betel Nuts and vehicles, deeming the confiscation illegal due to lack of evidence of illegal importation. The Adjudicator relied on circumstantial evidence, but the Commissioner emphasized the department&#039;s failure to prove the goods were smuggled. The Commissioner&#039;s decision, supported by Tribunal cases, stressed the burden of proof on the department. The judgment upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals and emphasizing the importance of proper evidence in customs-related cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343125</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>