<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 853 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343115</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the recovery of excess remuneration paid in violation of Section 314, dismissed most allegations of oppression and mismanagement, and ordered the exit of petitioners from the company at a fair value determined by an independent valuer. The decision emphasizes the distinction between statutory violations and business decisions, providing a structured exit mechanism to resolve the family dispute within the company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 May 2017 07:48:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 853 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343115</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the recovery of excess remuneration paid in violation of Section 314, dismissed most allegations of oppression and mismanagement, and ordered the exit of petitioners from the company at a fair value determined by an independent valuer. The decision emphasizes the distinction between statutory violations and business decisions, providing a structured exit mechanism to resolve the family dispute within the company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343115</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>