<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343100</link>
    <description>Banks may treat depreciation on government securities held in the investment portfolio as a deductible business loss or expenditure where the securities form part of banking stock-in-trade and the claim is consistent with prior accepted treatment. Premium amortisation on government securities is also deductible when covered by binding precedent for banks. A provision on standard assets made in line with RBI requirements may qualify for deduction under the bank bad-debt regime, but only after verification of the prescribed limits and relevant factual conditions, including the rural advances component. The first two claims were allowed, while the third was remitted for fresh examination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 May 2017 17:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343100</link>
      <description>Banks may treat depreciation on government securities held in the investment portfolio as a deductible business loss or expenditure where the securities form part of banking stock-in-trade and the claim is consistent with prior accepted treatment. Premium amortisation on government securities is also deductible when covered by binding precedent for banks. A provision on standard assets made in line with RBI requirements may qualify for deduction under the bank bad-debt regime, but only after verification of the prescribed limits and relevant factual conditions, including the rural advances component. The first two claims were allowed, while the third was remitted for fresh examination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343100</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>