<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 830 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343092</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the case to the AO/TPO for fresh determination of the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) for international transactions involving research and information services and information technology support services. The Tribunal excluded certain comparables for the research services due to functional dissimilarity and directed a reassessment of the nature of services for the IT support segment. Additionally, it upheld the treatment of interest on receivables as an international transaction and included forex gain/loss in operating revenue/costs. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=469066" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 830 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343092</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the case to the AO/TPO for fresh determination of the arm&#039;s length price (ALP) for international transactions involving research and information services and information technology support services. The Tribunal excluded certain comparables for the research services due to functional dissimilarity and directed a reassessment of the nature of services for the IT support segment. Additionally, it upheld the treatment of interest on receivables as an international transaction and included forex gain/loss in operating revenue/costs. The appeal of the assessee was partly allowed, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=343092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>