https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192198 Anti-dumping review proceedings require disclosure of all essential facts and computations relied upon, including the basis for non-injurious price, so that interested parties can make a meaningful response; non-disclosure of material data and late reliance on fresh information breached natural justice and rendered the disclosure statement defective. In a mid-term review under rule 23 and Annexure II, the designated authority had to apply the statutory test on likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury, but instead relied on irrelevant considerations and incorrect factual premises, including inconsistent treatment of price undercutting and injury margin. The impugned disclosure statements, final findings and notifications were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disclosure and reconsideration. en-us Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Feb 2018 16:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192198 Anti-dumping review proceedings require disclosure of all essential facts and computations relied upon, including the basis for non-injurious price, so that interested parties can make a meaningful response; non-disclosure of material data and late reliance on fresh information breached natural justice and rendered the disclosure statement defective. In a mid-term review under rule 23 and Annexure II, the designated authority had to apply the statutory test on likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and injury, but instead relied on irrelevant considerations and incorrect factual premises, including inconsistent treatment of price undercutting and injury margin. The impugned disclosure statements, final findings and notifications were set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disclosure and reconsideration. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=192198