<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (11) TMI 38 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7853</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the wife and minor sons of the assessee were dependants under section 2(g)(i) and their expenditures were includible in the taxable expenditure of the assessee under section 4(ii). The assessee was ordered to pay the costs of the Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=46903" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (11) TMI 38 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7853</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the wife and minor sons of the assessee were dependants under section 2(g)(i) and their expenditures were includible in the taxable expenditure of the assessee under section 4(ii). The assessee was ordered to pay the costs of the Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=7853</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>